linux-kernel - Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:41:07 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Kevin Liu <keyuan.liu@...il.com>
Cc:	m.szyprowski@...sung.com, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, lrg@...com,
	Philip Rakity <prakity@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for
 non-fixed regulators

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:36:28PM +0800, Kevin Liu wrote:
> 2012/11/14 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:

> > Should this be regulator_set_voltage_tol()?  Otherwise it'd be good to
> > explain where the numbers come from.

> In SD physical layer spec 3.01 chapter 6.6.1, the threshold level for
> voltage range is defined as below:
> Vdd(min) = 2.7V while Vdd(max) = 3.6V.
> The card should work within the voltage range.

> If you are afraid the voltage value is too aggressive, maybe we can
> use regulator_set_voltage_tol() to set a smaller range.
> But which range should be reasonable?

The above makes total sense - thanks!  I just wasn't aware that the
range was specified in this fashion in the spec.  Might be worth a
comment in the code if you need to respin.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)