[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADz5_gLb5ZRHLZHw1sDDWzu4QgOR7JXnaRMEXxETNzVsu1Wq1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:36:28 +0800
From: Kevin Liu <keyuan.liu@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: m.szyprowski@...sung.com, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, lrg@...com,
Philip Rakity <prakity@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for
non-fixed regulators
2012/11/14 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 03:11:37PM +0800, Kevin Liu wrote:
>
>> - ret = regulator_set_voltage(host->vqmmc, 3300000, 3300000);
>> + ret = regulator_set_voltage(host->vqmmc, 2700000, 3600000);
>
> Should this be regulator_set_voltage_tol()? Otherwise it'd be good to
> explain where the numbers come from.
In SD physical layer spec 3.01 chapter 6.6.1, the threshold level for
voltage range is defined as below:
Vdd(min) = 2.7V while Vdd(max) = 3.6V.
The card should work within the voltage range.
If you are afraid the voltage value is too aggressive, maybe we can
use regulator_set_voltage_tol() to set a smaller range.
But which range should be reasonable?
>> + ret = regulator_is_supported_voltage(host->vmmc, 1700000,
>> + 1950000);
>
> We should really add a regulator_is_supported_voltage_tol... let me
> just do that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists