linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mfd: add TI TPS80031 mfd core driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:01:26 -0500
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mfd: add TI TPS80031 mfd core driver

On 11/13/2012 09:45 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:35:45PM -0500, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> Yes, this is not a good idea, We will need support for wakeup
>> without wakeup registers.
>> Probably we need to add one more parameter, wake enable to control
>> without wake_base.
> This does not seem sensible.  Why would this be optional if it is
> useful?  In any case, what you're doing in the driver here is clearly
> not the way forward.
>

I was thinking  of adding wake_enable in struct regmap_irq_chip and 
decide the wake support based on the value if wake_enable true or 
wake_base is non-zero. then wake support should be enable.
The wake register write will happen only when wake_base is non-zero.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/