[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121116080549.GO17774@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:05:49 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org, w.sang@...gutronix.de,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:54:48AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:34:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 01:03:15 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Add support for translating ACPI GPIO pin numbers to Linux GPIO API pins.
> > > Needs a gpio controller driver with the acpi handler hook set.
> > >
> > > Drivers can use acpi_get_gpio() to translate ACPI5 GpioIO and GpioInt
> > > resources to Linux GPIO's.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> > > drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/acpi_gpio.h | 19 +++++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > > create mode 100644 include/linux/acpi_gpio.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > > index f11d8e3..5c9b384 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > > @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ config OF_GPIO
> > > def_bool y
> > > depends on OF
> > >
> > > +config GPIO_ACPI
> > > + def_bool y
> > > + depends on ACPI
> > > +
> > > config DEBUG_GPIO
> > > bool "Debug GPIO calls"
> > > depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> > > index 9aeed67..420dbac 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ ccflags-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO) += -DDEBUG
> > >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB) += gpiolib.o devres.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_OF_GPIO) += gpiolib-of.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ACPI) += gpiolib-acpi.o
> > >
> > > # Device drivers. Generally keep list sorted alphabetically
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_GENERIC) += gpio-generic.o
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..8ef9831
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * ACPI helpers for GPIO API
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2012, Intel Corporation
> > > + * Authors: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
> > > + * Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> > > + *
> > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> > > + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > > +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> > > +#include <linux/export.h>
> > > +#include <linux/acpi_gpio.h>
> > > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > > +
> > > +static int acpi_gpiochip_find(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + acpi_handle handle = data;
> > > +
> > > + if (!gc->dev)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + return gc->dev->acpi_handle == handle;
> >
> > I'd prefer DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() to be used in such places, we may want to
> > replace it with something else in the future or make it work differently.
>
> Sure but then we need to make it available for drivers as well when
> !CONFIG_ACPI. Something like below is needed.
One more thing, sometimes we want to assign the handle like in the case of
SPI controller driver we set the master->dev.acpi_handle. In that case we
can't use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() as is. Should we just do something like:
master->dev.acpi_handle = pdev->dev.acpi_handle;
or should we introduce some new macro that supports this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists