linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121116081246.GP17774@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:12:46 +0200
From:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
	rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
	khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org, w.sang@...gutronix.de,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:05:49AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> 
> One more thing, sometimes we want to assign the handle like in the case of
> SPI controller driver we set the master->dev.acpi_handle. In that case we
> can't use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() as is. Should we just do something like:
> 
> 	master->dev.acpi_handle = pdev->dev.acpi_handle;
> 
> or should we introduce some new macro that supports this?

Or we could just drop the cast from the macro and use the same.

	#define DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(dev)	((dev)->acpi_handle)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/