[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121116011353.GK24723@jonmason-lab>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:13:53 -0700
From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] net: Add support for NTB virtual ethernet device
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:30:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:11:09PM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> > A virtual ethernet device that uses the NTB transport API to
> > send/receive data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > drivers/net/Kconfig | 4 +
> > drivers/net/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/net/ntb_netdev.c | 415 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> As I haven't taken the core yet, I can't take this. But even then, I
> would need an ack from the network maintainers before I could.
I have been Cc'ing netdev on these patches and gotten many good
comments, but I can cc Dave Miller explicitly on my next version (as
there will obviously need to be one based on your comments on the
previous patch).
>
> And are you sure this is in the correct location in the tree?
I assumed that the virtual network client that uses NTB as a transport
would best fit in the network drivers. Is this a bad assumption?
Thanks,
Jon
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists