[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121116010621.GI24723@jonmason-lab>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:06:21 -0700
From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI-Express Non-Transparent Bridge Support
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:29:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:11:08PM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
> > +/*
> > + * This file is provided under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or
> > + * redistributing this file, you may do so under either license.
> > + *
> > + * GPL LICENSE SUMMARY
> > + *
> > + * Copyright(c) 2012 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > + * it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as
> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> > + *
> > + * BSD LICENSE
> > + *
> > + * Copyright(c) 2012 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + *
> > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> > + * are met:
> > + *
> > + * * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> > + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> > + * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copy
> > + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> > + * the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> > + * distribution.
> > + * * Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
> > + * contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
> > + * from this software without specific prior written permission.
> > + *
> > + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> > + * "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> > + * LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
> > + * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
> > + * OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
> > + * SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> > + * LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
> > + * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
> > + * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> > + * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
> > + * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> > + *
> > + * Intel PCIe NTB Linux driver
> > + *
> > + * Contact Information:
> > + * Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_B2B_JSF 0x3725
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_CLASSIC_JSF 0x3726
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_RP_JSF 0x3727
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_RP_SNB 0x3C08
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_B2B_SNB 0x3C0D
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_CLASSIC_SNB 0x3C0E
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_2ND_SNB 0x3C0F
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_B2B_BWD 0x0C4E
> > +
> > +#define msix_table_size(control) ((control & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE)+1)
> > +
> > +#define NTB_BAR_MMIO 0
> > +#define NTB_BAR_23 2
> > +#define NTB_BAR_45 4
> > +#define NTB_BAR_MASK ((1 << NTB_BAR_MMIO) | (1 << NTB_BAR_23) |\
> > + (1 << NTB_BAR_45))
> > +
> > +#define NTB_LINK_DOWN 0
> > +#define NTB_LINK_UP 1
> > +
> > +#define NTB_HB_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(1000)
> > +
> > +#define NTB_NUM_MW 2
> > +
> > +enum ntb_hw_event {
> > + NTB_EVENT_SW_EVENT0 = 0,
> > + NTB_EVENT_SW_EVENT1,
> > + NTB_EVENT_SW_EVENT2,
> > + NTB_EVENT_HW_ERROR,
> > + NTB_EVENT_HW_LINK_UP,
> > + NTB_EVENT_HW_LINK_DOWN,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ntb_mw {
> > + dma_addr_t phys_addr;
> > + void __iomem *vbase;
> > + resource_size_t bar_sz;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ntb_db_cb {
> > + void (*callback) (void *data, int db_num);
> > + unsigned int db_num;
> > + void *data;
> > + struct ntb_device *ndev;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ntb_device {
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > + struct msix_entry *msix_entries;
> > + void __iomem *reg_base;
> > + struct ntb_mw mw[NTB_NUM_MW];
> > + struct {
> > + unsigned int max_spads;
> > + unsigned int max_db_bits;
> > + unsigned int msix_cnt;
> > + } limits;
> > + struct {
> > + void __iomem *pdb;
> > + void __iomem *pdb_mask;
> > + void __iomem *sdb;
> > + void __iomem *sbar2_xlat;
> > + void __iomem *sbar4_xlat;
> > + void __iomem *spad_write;
> > + void __iomem *spad_read;
> > + void __iomem *lnk_cntl;
> > + void __iomem *lnk_stat;
> > + void __iomem *spci_cmd;
> > + } reg_ofs;
> > + void *ntb_transport;
>
> Use the real type here please. No void *.
>
> > + void (*event_cb)(void *handle, enum ntb_hw_event event);
> > +
> > + struct ntb_db_cb *db_cb;
> > + unsigned char hw_type;
> > + unsigned char conn_type;
> > + unsigned char dev_type;
> > + unsigned char num_msix;
> > + unsigned char bits_per_vector;
> > + unsigned char max_cbs;
> > + unsigned char link_status;
> > + struct delayed_work hb_timer;
> > + unsigned long last_ts;
> > +};
>
> Shouldn't this have a 'struct device' embedded it in somewhere?
>
>
> > +/**
> > + * ntb_hw_link_status() - return the hardware link status
> > + * @ndev: pointer to ntb_device instance
> > + *
> > + * Returns true if the hardware is connected to the remote system
> > + *
> > + * RETURNS: true or false based on the hardware link state
> > + */
> > +static inline bool ntb_hw_link_status(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + return ndev->link_status == NTB_LINK_UP;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * ntb_query_pdev() - return the pci_dev pointer
> > + * @ndev: pointer to ntb_device instance
> > + *
> > + * Given the ntb pointer return the pci_dev pointerfor the NTB hardware device
> > + *
> > + * RETURNS: a pointer to the ntb pci_dev
> > + */
> > +static inline struct pci_dev *ntb_query_pdev(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + return ndev->pdev;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * ntb_query_max_cbs() - return the maximum number of callback tuples
> > + * @ndev: pointer to ntb_device instance
> > + *
> > + * The number of callbacks can vary depending on the platform and MSI-X/MSI
> > + * enablement
> > + *
> > + * RETURNS: the maximum number of callback tuples (3, 15, or 33)
> > + */
> > +static inline unsigned int ntb_query_max_cbs(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> > +{
> > + return ndev->max_cbs;
> > +}
>
> It is shorter, and simpler, to just write the '->variable' version out
> for this, than to make the function call here. Why are these needed?
> Especially when I see the driver code not using them. Please remove.
This is used in ntb_transport.c. It is used to show how many
interrupts, and there-by clients, the transport layer can have. I can
make it a macro and/or put it in a header file, if that suits you
better.
> > +static void ntb_client_release(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +}
>
> Ah, how sweet. Now, according to the in-kernel documentation, I get to
> publicly mock you for trying to be smarter than the kernel. Nice try.
Consider me sufficiently shamed
>
> Think back to when you wrote this function. Did you really think it was
> the correct thing to do? If not, why did you do this?
Quick and dirty hack until I had more than one client driver, but I'll
implement it properly now.
>
>
>
> Sorry, no.
>
> > +struct bus_type ntb_bus_type = {
> > + .name = "ntb_bus",
> > + .match = ntb_match_bus,
> > + .probe = ntb_client_probe,
> > + .remove = ntb_client_remove,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static atomic_t ntb_bus_use = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > +
> > +static int __devinit ntb_bus_init(void)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + if (atomic_inc_return(&ntb_bus_use) == 1) {
>
> That's the wierdest way of using an atomic variable I have ever seen.
> How could this ever be anything but 0? If you need a lock, use a lock.
The driver is calling ntb_bus_init for every NTB device, but the bus
only needs to be done once.
>
> > +static int __devinit ntb_dev_init(struct ntb_transport *nt)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &nt->netdev;
>
> Ah, there's the struct device. Don't call it a 'netdev', that's just
> really really confusing to anyone who has looked at a network driver.
> As this isn't a netdev, it's a 'device'.
There currently is only 1 client, which is a virtual networking
device. However, I'll correct it to be more generic (per my comment
above).
>
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + rc = ntb_bus_init();
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + /* setup and register client devices */
> > + dev_set_name(dev, "ntb_netdev");
>
> All devices get the same name? That's a recipe for confusion.
>
> > +static void ntb_transport_setup_qp_mw(struct ntb_transport *nt,
> > + unsigned int qp_num)
> > +{
> > + struct ntb_transport_qp *qp = &nt->qps[qp_num];
> > + u8 mw_num = QP_TO_MW(qp_num);
> > + unsigned int size, num_qps_mw;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(nt->mw[mw_num].virt_addr == 0);
> > +
> > + if (nt->max_qps % NTB_NUM_MW && !mw_num)
> > + num_qps_mw = nt->max_qps / NTB_NUM_MW +
> > + (nt->max_qps % NTB_NUM_MW - mw_num);
> > + else
> > + num_qps_mw = nt->max_qps / NTB_NUM_MW;
> > +
> > + size = nt->mw[mw_num].size / num_qps_mw;
> > + pr_debug("orig size = %d, num qps = %d, size = %d\n",
> > + (int) nt->mw[mw_num].size, nt->max_qps, size);
> > +
> > + qp->rx_buff_begin = nt->mw[mw_num].virt_addr +
> > + (qp_num / NTB_NUM_MW * size);
> > + qp->rx_buff_end = qp->rx_buff_begin + size;
> > + pr_info("QP %d - RX Buff start %p end %p\n", qp->qp_num,
> > + qp->rx_buff_begin, qp->rx_buff_end);
> > + qp->rx_offset = qp->rx_buff_begin;
> > +
> > + qp->tx_mw_begin = ntb_get_mw_vbase(nt->ndev, mw_num) +
> > + (qp_num / NTB_NUM_MW * size);
> > + qp->tx_mw_end = qp->tx_mw_begin + size;
> > + pr_info("QP %d - TX MW start %p end %p\n", qp->qp_num, qp->tx_mw_begin,
> > + qp->tx_mw_end);
>
> That's some debugging information spamming the kernel log, please
> remove.
>
> Also, you have a 'struct device', so use dev_dbg() and friends, not pr_*
> calls. This should be fixed in lots of places here.
Will do, thanks for taking the time to review.
Thanks,
Jon
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists