linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/ftrace: Use __pa_symbol instead of _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50A6C6DB.2000205@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:06:03 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/ftrace: Use __pa_symbol instead of __pa on
 C visible symbols

On 11/16/2012 02:45 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> #define __pa(x)		__phys_addr((unsigned long)(x))
> #define __pa_symbol(x)	__pa(__phys_reloc_hide((unsigned long)(x)))
>
> I'm confused. __pa_symbol() just calls __pa() with some macro magic to
> its parameter. How is this a performance improvement?
>

One of the earlier patches in this series changes __pa_symbol() to avoid 
the conditional hidden inside __phys_addr(), since by definition a 
symbol can only be on one side of that branch.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/