[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A6CA24.9020809@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:20:04 -0800
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/ftrace: Use __pa_symbol instead of __pa on
C visible symbols
On 11/16/2012 03:06 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/16/2012 02:45 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>> #define __pa(x) __phys_addr((unsigned long)(x))
>> #define __pa_symbol(x) __pa(__phys_reloc_hide((unsigned long)(x)))
>>
>> I'm confused. __pa_symbol() just calls __pa() with some macro magic to
>> its parameter. How is this a performance improvement?
>>
>
> One of the earlier patches in this series changes __pa_symbol() to
> avoid the conditional hidden inside __phys_addr(), since by definition
> a symbol can only be on one side of that branch.
>
> -hpa
>
In addition to being a bit faster the code is also a bit smaller since
it can combine the the constants from __va() and __pa_symbol() as the
new __pa_symbol is an inline in the non-debug case.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists