[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121116235308.GE27012@mail.gnudd.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 00:53:08 +0100
From: Davide Ciminaghi <ciminaghi@...dd.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] regmap: introduce tables for readable/writeable/volatile/precious checks
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:19:07AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:46:52PM +0100, ciminaghi@...dd.com wrote:
>
> > I haven't seen any reply up to now, so I'm just resending the original patch
> > (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/25/224).
> > I just applied it to today's next and did a quick re-test.
>
> The fact that you don't send a real name in your patch submission mails
> might be an issue here - I suspect you've fallen foul of spam filtering,
> either automatic or human, there's no sign of this in my pending queue.
>
mmm maybe I did something wrong with git send-email. Will check, thanks for
pointing this out.
> > +static inline bool _reg_in_ranges(unsigned int reg,
> > + const struct regmap_range *ranges,
> > + unsigned int nranges)
> > +{
> > + const struct regmap_range *r;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0, r = ranges; i < nranges; i++, r++)
> > + if (_reg_in_range(reg, r))
> > + return true;
> > + return false;
> > +}
>
> It would be better to make this an externally visible function (perhaps
> just move it into the header with a regmap on the front of the name) so
> that drivers can use this as part of the implementation of more complex
> checks. Otherwise this looks fine.
ok, I'll fix the patch and resend it next week.
Thanks and regards
Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists