linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: fix shmem_getpage_gfp VM_BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211162018010.1164@eggly.anvils>
Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:48:46 -0800 (PST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Jaegeuk Hanse <jaegeuk.hanse@...il.com>
cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: fix shmem_getpage_gfp VM_BUG_ON

Further offtopic..

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Jaegeuk Hanse wrote:
> Some questions about your shmem/tmpfs: misc and fallocate patchset.
> 
> - Since shmem_setattr can truncate tmpfs files, why need add another similar
> codes in function shmem_fallocate? What's the trick?

I don't know if I understand you.  In general, hole-punching is different
from truncation.  Supporting the hole-punch mode of the fallocate system
call is different from supporting truncation.  They're closely related,
and share code, but meet different specifications.

> - in tmpfs: support fallocate preallocation patch changelog:
>   "Christoph Hellwig: What for exactly?  Please explain why preallocating on
> tmpfs would make any sense.
>   Kay Sievers: To be able to safely use mmap(), regarding SIGBUS, on files on
> the /dev/shm filesystem.  The glibc fallback loop for -ENOSYS [or
> -EOPNOTSUPP] on fallocate is just ugly."
>   Could shmem/tmpfs fallocate prevent one process truncate the file which the
> second process mmap() and get SIGBUS when the second process access mmap but
> out of current size of file?

Again, I don't know if I understand you.  fallocate does not prevent
truncation or races or SIGBUS.  I believe that Kay meant that without
using fallocate to allocate the memory in advance, systemd found it hard
to protect itself from the possibility of getting a SIGBUS, if access to
a shmem mapping happened to run out of memory/space in the middle.

I never grasped why writing the file in advance was not good enough:
fallocate happened to be what they hoped to use, and it was hard to
deny it, given that tmpfs already supported hole-punching, and was
about to convert to the fallocate interface for that.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/