[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121118155539.GE17774@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:55:39 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, ben-linux@...ff.org,
w.sang@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3 UPDATED] i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:24:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, maybe there is one. Perhaps we can make acpi_platform_notify()
> call acpi_bind_one() upfront and only if that fails, do the whole
> type->find_device() dance? Of course, acpi_bind_one() would need to
> be modified slightly too, like in the patch below.
>
> If we did that, acpi_i2c_add_device() would only need to assign acpi_handle
> as appropriate before calling i2c_new_device() (and analogously for SPI).
>
> What do you think?
This is certainly better than the thing we use currently. It makes adding
I2C and SPI support much shorter and simpler. If others don't object I
would suggest that we switch to use this method.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists