| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20121118.203005.151867624663051294.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:30:05 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, monstr@...str.eu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: sigaltstack fun From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:10:13 +0000 > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 04:18:33PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> >> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:02:53 +0000 >> >> > Are you OK with the patch below? Should be the minimal fix, getting >> > rid of those segfaults and converting to usual semantics here... >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> >> >> Yep, looks fine: >> >> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> > > Er... So which tree should that go through? sparc or signal? There's > a similar microblaze patch and a few more of the "do_sigaltstack() takes > userland pointer" variety, so I can put together a pile in > signal.git#for-linus, but if you prefer that to go through sparc tree, > I'm fine with that... I'm happy to take it via my sparc tree, and I'll queue it up for -stable as well. Can you resend it to me with a proper commit message? Thanks a lot Al. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists