| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3954977.fT8lC34ML2@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:57:13 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, ben-linux@...ff.org,
w.sang@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [Update][PATCH 1/3] ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be initialized in advance
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Currently, the ACPI handles of devices are initialized from within
device_add(), by acpi_bind_one() called from acpi_platform_notify()
which first uses the .find_device() routine provided by the device's
bus type to find the matching device node in the ACPI namespace.
This is a source of some computational overhead and, moreover, the
correctness of the result depends on the implementation of
.find_device() which is known to fail occasionally for some bus types
(e.g. PCI). In some cases, however, the corresponding ACPI device
node is known already before calling device_add() for the given
struct device object and the whole .find_device() dance in
acpi_platform_notify() is then simply unnecessary.
For this reason, make it possible to initialize the ACPI handles of
devices before calling device_add() for them. Modify
acpi_platform_notify() to call acpi_bind_one() in advance to check
the device's existing ACPI handle and skip the .find_device()
search if that is successful. Change acpi_bind_one() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/glue.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/acpi/glue.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/glue.c
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/glue.c
@@ -130,46 +130,59 @@ static int acpi_bind_one(struct device *
{
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
acpi_status status;
- struct acpi_device_physical_node *physical_node;
+ struct acpi_device_physical_node *physical_node, *pn;
char physical_node_name[sizeof(PHYSICAL_NODE_STRING) + 2];
int retval = -EINVAL;
if (dev->acpi_handle) {
- dev_warn(dev, "Drivers changed 'acpi_handle'\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (handle) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "ACPI handle is already set\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ handle = dev->acpi_handle;
+ }
}
+ if (!handle)
+ return -EINVAL;
get_device(dev);
status = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
goto err;
- physical_node = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_device_physical_node),
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ physical_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*physical_node), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!physical_node) {
retval = -ENOMEM;
goto err;
}
mutex_lock(&acpi_dev->physical_node_lock);
+
+ /* Sanity check. */
+ list_for_each_entry(pn, &acpi_dev->physical_node_list, node)
+ if (pn->dev == dev) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "Already associated with ACPI node\n");
+ goto err_free;
+ }
+
/* allocate physical node id according to physical_node_id_bitmap */
physical_node->node_id =
find_first_zero_bit(acpi_dev->physical_node_id_bitmap,
ACPI_MAX_PHYSICAL_NODE);
if (physical_node->node_id >= ACPI_MAX_PHYSICAL_NODE) {
retval = -ENOSPC;
- mutex_unlock(&acpi_dev->physical_node_lock);
- kfree(physical_node);
- goto err;
+ goto err_free;
}
set_bit(physical_node->node_id, acpi_dev->physical_node_id_bitmap);
physical_node->dev = dev;
list_add_tail(&physical_node->node, &acpi_dev->physical_node_list);
acpi_dev->physical_node_count++;
+
mutex_unlock(&acpi_dev->physical_node_lock);
- dev->acpi_handle = handle;
+ if (!dev->acpi_handle)
+ dev->acpi_handle = handle;
if (!physical_node->node_id)
strcpy(physical_node_name, PHYSICAL_NODE_STRING);
@@ -187,8 +200,14 @@ static int acpi_bind_one(struct device *
return 0;
err:
+ dev->acpi_handle = NULL;
put_device(dev);
return retval;
+
+ err_free:
+ mutex_unlock(&acpi_dev->physical_node_lock);
+ kfree(physical_node);
+ goto err;
}
static int acpi_unbind_one(struct device *dev)
@@ -247,6 +266,10 @@ static int acpi_platform_notify(struct d
acpi_handle handle;
int ret = -EINVAL;
+ ret = acpi_bind_one(dev, NULL);
+ if (!ret)
+ goto out;
+
if (!dev->bus || !dev->parent) {
/* bridge devices genernally haven't bus or parent */
ret = acpi_find_bridge_device(dev, &handle);
@@ -260,10 +283,11 @@ static int acpi_platform_notify(struct d
}
if ((ret = type->find_device(dev, &handle)) != 0)
DBG("Can't get handler for %s\n", dev_name(dev));
- end:
+ end:
if (!ret)
acpi_bind_one(dev, handle);
+ out:
#if ACPI_GLUE_DEBUG
if (!ret) {
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists