[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1914456.6xpKcjJgfG@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 02:04:02 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, vijaymohan.pandarathil@...com,
imammedo@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 1/5] ACPI: Add acpi_pr_<level>() interfaces
On Monday, November 19, 2012 10:26:43 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 18:35 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, November 19, 2012 09:16:52 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 08:06 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 08:51 -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 00:56 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > > is acpi_bus.h really the right file for these prototypes?
> > > > > This interface is limited for ACPI, so it should be declared in a header
> > > > > file under include/acpi. Among the files in this directory, acpi_bus.h
> > > > > seems to be a good fit as it declares the interfaces provided by ACPI
> > > > > core.
> > > >
> > > > I'd've put them in acpi.h or maybe created acpi_utils.h
> > >
> > > Hi Joe,
> > >
> > > We cannot use acpi.h since it is an ACPICA header.
> >
> > Which acpi.h are you referring to?
>
>
> I was referring "include/acpi/acpi.h".
There is another acpi.h in include/linux that can be used for this purpose.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists