[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121121093800.GA26148@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:38:00 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: numa/core regressions fixed - more testers wanted
* David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> I started profiling on a new machine that is an exact
> duplicate of the 16-way, 4 node, 32GB machine I was profiling
> with earlier to rule out any machine-specific problems. I
> pulled master and ran new comparisons with THP enabled at
> c418de93e398 ("Merge branch 'x86/mm'"):
>
> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING disabled 136521.55 SPECjbb2005 bops
> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING enabled 132476.07 SPECjbb2005 bops (-3.0%)
>
> Aside: neither 4739578c3ab3 ("x86/mm: Don't flush the TLB on
> #WP pmd fixups") nor 01e9c2441eee ("x86/vsyscall: Add Kconfig
> option to use native vsyscalls and switch to it")
> significantly improved upon the throughput on this system.
Could you please send an updated profile done with latest -tip?
The last profile I got from you still had the vsyscall emulation
page faults in it.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists