[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121121093528.4fe11c26@tom-ThinkPad-T410>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:35:28 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Solomon Peachy <pizza@...ftnet.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [firmware_class] Fix compile with no builtin firmware
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:12:03 -0500
Solomon Peachy <pizza@...ftnet.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:33:09AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > The corresponding .config is attached. Note that it is for a uClinux
> > > 3.3.0-uc0 kernel.
> >
> > Lots of things have changed in the firmware code since 3.3.0, can you
> > retest this on the 3.7-rc6 tree?
Solomon, I can't duplicate the build failure with your .config on 3.7-rc5-next.
>
> Not easily; My employer is contracted to do some driver porting and
> we're stuck with the kernel the client provided. However, the patch is
> still relevant for upstream, because the underlying problem still
> exists:
>
> * The #ifdef wraps code that pertains solely to built-in firmware, (ie
> CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL) and has an #else path for when it's disabled.
> * There is no point in a CONFIG_FW_LOADER test inside firmware_class.c
> when the file isn't even compiled unless CONFIG_FW_LOADER is defined.
Enabling CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE still can make one firmware built in kernel
even though CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL isn't defined, so your patch will break
this case.
>
> Perhaps the compile problem is solved in newer kernels (by always
> generating an empty builtin firmware list?) but the #ifdef is still
> incorrect.
Looks the problem hasn't been reported before.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists