[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12328820.crXDTeuliY@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:03:26 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: w.sang@...gutronix.de,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C
On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few
> > iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point.
> >
> > I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or
> > would like the patches to be modified somehow?
> >
> > If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because
> > the patches depend on some changes already in that tree. Hopefully, that's OK.
>
> For GPIO I want Grant to ACK this.
>
> He has experience with both Device Tree and GPIO, knows what ACPI and
> UEFI is and is way better suited than me to give feedback on this kind of
> stuff.
>
> So from my stance it's "neutral, whatever Grant says goes".
OK, we're waiting for a word from Grant, then. :-)
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists