linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121122013627.GG4371@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:36:29 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
	w.sang@...gutronix.de,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lenb@...nel.org, khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or
> would like the patches to be modified somehow?

> If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because
> the patches depend on some changes already in that tree.  Hopefully, that's OK.

Honestly I stopped reading these patches as there were so many patch
revisions and incremental versions mixed in to one big thread that it's
very hard to follow.  Will go back and check...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)