[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ_GT_k13wfihRp2=nSdf8bkJGt6SSQETBG7AouBzYXgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:43:28 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: w.sang@...gutronix.de,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few
> iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point.
>
> I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or
> would like the patches to be modified somehow?
>
> If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because
> the patches depend on some changes already in that tree. Hopefully, that's OK.
For GPIO I want Grant to ACK this.
He has experience with both Device Tree and GPIO, knows what ACPI and
UEFI is and is way better suited than me to give feedback on this kind of
stuff.
So from my stance it's "neutral, whatever Grant says goes".
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists