lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121122004042.200738895@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:40:34 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Alex Elder <elder@...amhost.com>,
	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Subject: [ 088/171] rbd: dont hold spinlock during messenger flush

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alex Elder <elder@...amhost.com>

(cherry picked from commit cd9d9f5df6098c50726200d4185e9e8da32785b3)

A recent change made changes to the rbd_client_list be protected by
a spinlock.  Unfortunately in rbd_put_client(), the lock is taken
before possibly dropping the last reference to an rbd_client, and on
the last reference that eventually calls flush_workqueue() which can
sleep.

The problem was flagged by a debug spinlock warning:
    BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#3, rbd/27814

The solution is to move the spinlock acquisition and release inside
rbd_client_release(), which is the spot where it's really needed for
protecting the removal of the rbd_client from the client list.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...amhost.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/block/rbd.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -450,7 +450,9 @@ static void rbd_client_release(struct kr
 	struct rbd_client *rbdc = container_of(kref, struct rbd_client, kref);
 
 	dout("rbd_release_client %p\n", rbdc);
+	spin_lock(&rbd_client_list_lock);
 	list_del(&rbdc->node);
+	spin_unlock(&rbd_client_list_lock);
 
 	ceph_destroy_client(rbdc->client);
 	kfree(rbdc->rbd_opts);
@@ -463,9 +465,7 @@ static void rbd_client_release(struct kr
  */
 static void rbd_put_client(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev)
 {
-	spin_lock(&rbd_client_list_lock);
 	kref_put(&rbd_dev->rbd_client->kref, rbd_client_release);
-	spin_unlock(&rbd_client_list_lock);
 	rbd_dev->rbd_client = NULL;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ