linux-kernel - [ 041/171] netfilter: Validate the sequence number of dataless ACK packets as well

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121122004037.483723325@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:39:47 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [ 041/171] netfilter: Validate the sequence number of dataless ACK packets as well

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>

commit 4a70bbfaef0361d27272629d1a250a937edcafe4 upstream.

We spare nothing by not validating the sequence number of dataless
ACK packets and enabling it makes harder off-path attacks.

See: "Reflection scan: an Off-Path Attack on TCP" by Jan Wrobel,
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.2074

Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c |   10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
@@ -627,15 +627,9 @@ static bool tcp_in_window(const struct n
 		ack = sack = receiver->td_end;
 	}
 
-	if (seq == end
-	    && (!tcph->rst
-		|| (seq == 0 && state->state == TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT)))
+	if (tcph->rst && seq == 0 && state->state == TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT)
 		/*
-		 * Packets contains no data: we assume it is valid
-		 * and check the ack value only.
-		 * However RST segments are always validated by their
-		 * SEQ number, except when seq == 0 (reset sent answering
-		 * SYN.
+		 * RST sent answering SYN.
 		 */
 		seq = end = sender->td_end;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/