linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121122214325.GB14771@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de>
Date:	Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:43:25 +0100
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@...onic-design.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>,
	Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Various small fixes

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:58:12PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote:
> A few fixes for the LPC32 PWM driver:
> 
> * [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity
> * [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Properly disable the clock on device remove
> * [PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Set the chip base for dynamic allocation

Roland, Alexandre,

can you guys take a look at these? At least 3 is very straightforward
but I'd still like your Acked-by or Reviewed-by on the other two. Are
there any potential issues? If Alban doesn't resend, I'm tempted to make
the stylistic changes that I requested myself and push them for 3.8.
That is if I get an Acked-by from one of you guys for 1 and 2.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped