[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121123094406.GS3867@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:44:06 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci-acpi: add SDHCI ACPI driver
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:43:50AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> +static int __devinit sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + acpi_handle handle = dev->acpi_handle;
This is not going to work anymore, you'll have to use ACPI_HANDLE(dev) for
this (there was a new macro introduced with the struct acpi_dev_node).
> + struct acpi_device *device;
> + struct sdhci_acpi_host *c;
> + struct sdhci_host *host;
> + struct resource *iomem;
> + resource_size_t len;
> + const char *hid;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (acpi_bus_get_status(device) || !device->status.present)
> + return -ENODEV;
This is a bit redundant as the platform code already checks whether the
device is present or not and only creates the platform device in case it is
present.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists