[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpommGWb0WRnUDd_Do4yuadA5RcR4_ULFEqt+t9DNFnCg-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:23:28 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ondemand: fix wrong delay sampling rate
On 23 November 2012 18:42, Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org> wrote:
> Restore the correct delay value for ondemand's od_dbs_timer, as it was
> changed erroneously in 83f0e55.
>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> index bdaab92..cca3e9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> @@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ static void od_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
> dbs_info->sample_type = OD_SUB_SAMPLE;
> delay = dbs_info->freq_hi_jiffies;
> } else {
> - delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(dbs_info->rate_mult);
> + delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(od_tuners.sampling_rate
> + * dbs_info->rate_mult);
So sorry for my poor code :(
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists