linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ondemand: fix wrong delay sampling rate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Nov 2012 20:57:02 +0100
From:	Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ondemand: fix wrong delay sampling rate

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 07:23:28PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 23 November 2012 18:42, Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org> wrote:
> > Restore the correct delay value for ondemand's od_dbs_timer, as it was
> > changed erroneously in 83f0e55.
> >
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> > index bdaab92..cca3e9f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> > @@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ static void od_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
> >                         dbs_info->sample_type = OD_SUB_SAMPLE;
> >                         delay = dbs_info->freq_hi_jiffies;
> >                 } else {
> > -                       delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(dbs_info->rate_mult);
> > +                       delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(od_tuners.sampling_rate
> > +                                               * dbs_info->rate_mult);
> 
> So sorry for my poor code :(

Actually I think that the new code is much better structured, and the
patch was so big that I'll be surprised if this would be the only bug!

My problem is that I had to rewrite a patch based on the old code almost
line-by-line but... these are the rules of the game!

> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Thanks,
Fabio

-- 
Fabio Baltieri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/