[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJOrxZBp52a_7Rx6nxoSkMTTLHxA4pDnyfirLgN7BZXC8BxBzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:06:09 +0200
From: Metin Döşlü <metindoslu@...il.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Hanse <jaegeuk.hanse@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: Problem in Page Cache Replacement
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:07:22PM +0200, Metin Döşlü wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse <jaegeuk.hanse@...il.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 11/21/2012 05:58 PM, metin d wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Fengguang,
>> >
>> > I run tests and attached the results. The line below I guess shows the data-1 page caches.
>> >
>> > 0x000000080000006c 6584051 25718 __RU_lA___________________P________ referenced,uptodate,lru,active,private
>> >
>> >
>> > I thinks this is just one state of page cache pages.
>>
>> But why these page caches are in this state as opposed to other page
>> caches. From the results I conclude that:
>>
>> data-1 pages are in state : referenced,uptodate,lru,active,private
>
> I wonder if it's this code that stops data-1 pages from being
> reclaimed:
>
> shrink_page_list():
>
> if (page_has_private(page)) {
> if (!try_to_release_page(page, sc->gfp_mask))
> goto activate_locked;
>
> What's the filesystem used?
It was ext3.
>> data-2 pages are in state : referenced,uptodate,lru,mappedtodisk
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
--
Metin Döşlü
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists