linux-kernel - Re: Streamlining Developer's Certificate of Origin, Signed-off-by tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <20121124142515.GA26479@odin.tremily.us>
Date:	Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:25:15 -0500
From:	"W. Trevor King" <wking@...mily.us>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Streamlining Developer's Certificate of Origin, Signed-off-by tag

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:10:43AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Not just a separate document but project / github / whatever given
> > that other projects are referring to it now, and we stand to gain more
> > in the community by streamlining it more and making it ubiquitous.
> 
> Cutting and pasting it somewhere works (subject to whatever licensing
> it may have itself), as does having a list and a location for a copy, but
> you still want it in the tree proper.

I'm transitioning a project to the DCO-1.1 and trying to get its
licensing straightened out.  The DCO-1.0 [1] and DCO-1.1 [2] commits
were both by Linus, but lacked SOB lines in the commit.  The initial
proposal was also by Linus [3] (and this initial DCO version is what
was committed in [1]).  However, the OSDL (where Linus was working at
the time) seems to claim copyright for itself and claims
CC-BY-SA-2.5-generic [4].  Strangely, the DCO-1.1 text listed on the
archived OSDL page does not match the text of the DCO-1.1 text in the
kernel tree (the differences look minor to me, but I'm not a laywer).

So.  What license is the DCO distributed under and who holds
copyright?

Cheers,
Trevor

[1]: From: Linus Torvalds
     Subject: Start documenting the sign-off procedure in SubmittingPatches
     Date: 2004-06-01 19:13:52 GMT
     Gmane: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.commits.head/33254

     ChangeSet 1.1726.1.148, 2004/06/01 12:13:52-07:00, torvalds…

[2]: commit cbd83da82b15292337ff2b71e619c9a3a95f6d80
     Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...970.osdl.org>
     Date:   Mon Jun 13 17:51:55 2005 -0700

       Update DCO ("signoff") rules to 1.1

[3]: From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds <at> osdl.org>
     Subject: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission
     Date: 2004-05-23 06:46:29 GMT
     Gmane: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/205867

[4]: http://web.archive.org/web/20070306195036/http://osdlab.org/newsroom/press_releases/2004/2004_05_24_dco.html

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)