[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJn8CcFVOS-pR6O7AGTLKE-47qWOUCDaMXA9Xa-BsdJ7ks2stw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:25:14 +0800
From: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/ethernet/jme.c between commit 71c6c837a0fe ("drivers/net: fix
> tasklet misuse issue") from Linus' tree and commit "tasklet: ignore
> disabled tasklet in tasklet_action()" from the akpm tree.
>
You can simply remove the following part of the patch
@@ -1862,8 +1862,8 @@ jme_open(struct net_device *netdev)
tasklet_enable(&jme->linkch_task);
tasklet_enable(&jme->txclean_task);
- tasklet_hi_enable(&jme->rxclean_task);
- tasklet_hi_enable(&jme->rxempty_task);
+ tasklet_enable(&jme->rxclean_task);
+ tasklet_enable(&jme->rxempty_task);
rc = jme_request_irq(jme);
if (rc)
Do you want me to re-generate a patch for you?
> I am not sure what to do here, so I have dropped the akpm patch.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists