linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V1 1/3] mfd: stmpe: Arrange #include <header files> in alphabetical order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121126132557.GA6824@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:25:57 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	spear-devel@...t.st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/3] mfd: stmpe: Arrange #include <header files> in
 alphabetical order

On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> On 26 November 2012 16:46, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi Viresh,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:26:18AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> This helps managing them better and also reduces chances of adding an header
> >> file twice.
> 
> The aim is to maintain the list of header files in alphabetical order.
> It helps in maintaining
> them.. I was adding some header files for my 3rd patch and was looking
> for the best
> place to add them and because the list wasn't sorted, i sorted it out
> in a separate patch.

Why do you need to sort them? Is there _really_ a need?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/