[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121126153145.GC6824@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:31:45 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
spear-devel@...t.st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/3] mfd: stmpe: Arrange #include <header files> in
alphabetical order
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26 November 2012 18:55, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > Why do you need to sort them? Is there _really_ a need?
>
> Many people & maintainers like to have their header files ordered. The
> reason for that is:
>
> If they are not ordered, there is a possibility of adding an header file
> multiple times in a file. This might not do something serious
> when thinking about compilation time or Image size, but adding an header
> file multiple times is simply wrong.
>
> This can't be caught in patch reviews most of the time, as diff may not show
> the earlier inclusion.
>
> That's why i ordered them. And i don't see any harm in doing so.
I don't see any harm in it, but it's pretty pointless.
There aren't many maintainers who insist on such things, and the
ones that do normally carry out these OCD actions themselves. :)
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists