[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121126160543.GV12685@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:05:43 +0100
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
spear-devel@...t.st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/3] mfd: stmpe: Arrange #include <header files> in
alphabetical order
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:31:45PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> > On 26 November 2012 18:55, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Why do you need to sort them? Is there _really_ a need?
> >
> > Many people & maintainers like to have their header files ordered. The
> > reason for that is:
> >
> > If they are not ordered, there is a possibility of adding an header file
> > multiple times in a file. This might not do something serious
> > when thinking about compilation time or Image size, but adding an header
> > file multiple times is simply wrong.
> >
> > This can't be caught in patch reviews most of the time, as diff may not show
> > the earlier inclusion.
> >
> > That's why i ordered them. And i don't see any harm in doing so.
>
> I don't see any harm in it, but it's pretty pointless.
>
> There aren't many maintainers who insist on such things,
And I'm not one of those.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists