[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121126164157.c7f86ee6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:41:57 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
Matthew Helsley <matt.helsley@...il.com>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bfields@...ldses.org,
oleg@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com, tvrtko.ursulin@...lan.co.uk,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] fs, notify: Add procfs fdinfo helper v6
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:19:44 +0400
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> This allow us to print out fsnotify details such as
> watchee inode, device, mask and optionally a file handle.
This helps the compiler quite a lot:
--- a/fs/notify/fdinfo.c~fs-notify-add-procfs-fdinfo-helper-v7-fix
+++ a/fs/notify/fdinfo.c
@@ -26,13 +26,13 @@ static int show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *
struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
int ret = 0;
- spin_lock(&group->mark_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&group->mark_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(mark, &group->marks_list, g_list) {
ret = show(m, mark);
if (ret)
break;
}
- spin_unlock(&group->mark_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
return ret;
}
But I rather worry that the code which you sent clearly wasn't the code
which you tested. Please retest and confirm that I now have the correct
code?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists