lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:49:19 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mst@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't
 free skb immediately after sent

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:

> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
> >> (usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
> >> virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet sending. This
> >> would lead the pktgen to wait forever in the refcount of the skb if no other
> >> pakcet will be sent afterwards.
> >>
> >> Solving this issue by introducing a new flag IFF_TX_SKB_FREE_DELAY which could
> >> notify the pktgen that the device does not free skb immediately after it has
> >> been sent and let it not to wait for the refcount to be one.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > Another alternative would be using skb_orphan() and skb->destructor.
> > There are other cases where skb's are not freed right away.
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Hi Stephen:
> 
> Do you mean registering a skb->destructor for pktgen then set and check 
> bits in skb->tx_flag?

Yes. Register a destructor that does something like update a counter (number of packets pending),
then just spin while number of packets pending is over threshold.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ