[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354035129.3284.54.camel@thor>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:52:09 -0500
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] TTY: call tty_port_destroy in the rest of drivers
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 09:49 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> After commit "TTY: move tty buffers to tty_port", the tty buffers are
> not freed in some drivers. This is because tty_port_destructor is not
> called whenever a tty_port is freed. This was an assumption I counted
> with but was unfortunately untrue. So fix the drivers to fulfil this
> assumption.
>
> To be sure, the TTY buffers (and later some stuff) are gone along with
> the tty_port, we have to call tty_port_destroy at tear-down places.
> This is mostly where the structure containing a tty_port is freed.
> This patch does exactly that -- put tty_port_destroy at those places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Hi Jiri & Greg & Alan,
I'd be more than willing to fixup staging/fwserial against this series
but I'm unclear on the mechanics since this series isn't in staging-next
and staging/fwserial isn't in tty-next.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists