linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pppoatm: protect against freeing of vcc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1354036592.2534.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:16:32 +0000
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nathan@...verse.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pppoatm: protect against freeing of vcc

Krzysztof, you've fixed a bunch of races... but I think there's one
still left.

An ATM driver will often have code like this, which gets called from
arbitrary contexts:
        if (vcc->pop)
                vcc->pop(vcc, skb);

Now, what happens if pppoatm_send(vcc, NULL) happens after the address
of vcc->pop (currently pppoatm_pop) has been loaded, but before the
function is actually called?

You tear down all the setup and set vcc->user_back to NULL. And then
pppoatm_pop() gets called. And promptly crashes because pvcc is NULL.

A lot of these problems exist for br2684 too, and in prodding at it a
little I can consistently crash the system by sending a flood of
outbound packets while I kill the br2684ctl program. I end up in
br2684_pop() with vcc->user_back == NULL. In looking to see how you'd
fixed that in pppoatm, I realised that you haven't... :)

-- 
dwmw2

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (6171 bytes)