[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50B4F5B6.6000008@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:17:42 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Terje Bergström <tbergstrom@...dia.com>
CC: "thierry.reding@...onic-design.de" <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arto Merilainen <amerilainen@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 5/8] ARM: tegra: Add auxiliary data for nvhost
On 11/26/2012 11:33 PM, Terje Bergström wrote:
> On 27.11.2012 01:39, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Clock names shouldn't be passed in platform data; instead, clk_get()
>> should be passed the device object and device-relative (i.e. not global)
>> clock name. I expect if the driver is fixed to make this change, the
>> changes to tegra*_clocks_data.c won't be needed either.
>
> Isn't this code doing exactly that - getting a device relative clock,
> nvhost_module_init() in nvhost.acm.c:
>
> (...)
> /* initialize clocks to known state */
> while (pdata->clocks[i].name && i < NVHOST_MODULE_MAX_CLOCKS) {
> long rate = pdata->clocks[i].default_rate;
> struct clk *c;
>
> c = devm_clk_get(&dev->dev, pdata->clocks[i].name);
The line above is getting the (device-relative) clock name from platform
data, rather than using some fixed name as it should be.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists