[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87haobolvw.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:49:39 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, "x86\@kernel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kexec\@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] x86/kexec: add a new atomic notifier list for kdump
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com> writes:
> So in summary,
>
> 1. a specific callback function instead of a notifier?
Yes.
> 2. Instead of calling vmclear_local_loaded_vmcss, the vmclear operation
> will just call the vmclear on every vmcss loaded on the cpu?
>
> like below:
>
> static void crash_vmclear_local_loaded_vmcss(void)
> {
> int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> struct loaded_vmcs *v, *n;
>
> if (!crash_local_vmclear_enabled(cpu))
> return;
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(v, n, &per_cpu(loaded_vmcss_on_cpu, cpu),
> loaded_vmcss_on_cpu_link)
> vmcs_clear(v->vmcs);
> }
>
> right?
Yeah that looks good. I would do list_for_each_entry because the list
isn't changing.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists