[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVN1-W3vLK5J75kQgt+0BW3sd2GkWi+4EeJMYwoyPi-gg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:38:06 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 34/46] x86, mm: Add check before clear pte above
max_low_pfn on 32bit
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>> /*
>> * Remove any mappings which extend past the end of physical
>> - * memory from the boot time page table:
>> + * memory from the boot time page table.
>> + * In virtual address space, we should have at least two pages
>> + * from VMALLOC_END to pkmap or fixmap according to VMALLOC_END
>> + * definition. And max_low_pfn is set to VMALLOC_END physical
>> + * address. If initial memory mapping is doing right job, we
>> + * should have pte used near max_low_pfn or one pmd is not present.
>
> 'have pte used near' ?
>
> Do you mean we should have an used PTE near max_low_pfn and one
> empty PMD?
>
==>
* we should have used PTE to map address near max_low_pfn or
* one empty PMD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists