[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1211291319370.25003@file.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:23:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Do a proper locking for mmap and block size change
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > This sounds sensible. I'm sending this patch.
>
> This looks much better.
>
> I think I'll apply this for 3.7 (since it's too late to do anything
> fancier), and then for 3.8 I will rip out all the locking entirely,
> because looking at the fs/buffer.c patch I wrote up, it's all totally
> unnecessary.
>
> Adding a ACCESS_ONCE() to the read of the i_blkbits value (when
> creating new buffers) simply makes the whole locking thing pointless.
> Just make the page lock protect the block size, and make it per-page,
> and we're done.
>
> No RCU grace period crap, no expedited mess, no nothing.
>
> Linus
Yes.
If you remove that percpu rw lock, you also need to rewrite direct i/o
code.
In theory, block device direct i/o doesn't need buffer block size at all.
But in practice, it shares a lot of code with filesystem direct i/o, it
reads the block size multiple times and it crashes if it changes.
Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists