[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzpKH2FkU+9hdhZ5L9n8Mqr1vNO3Tdjmu1n+WmcHG1sNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:46:06 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Do a proper locking for mmap and block size change
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> If you remove that percpu rw lock, you also need to rewrite direct i/o
> code.
>
> In theory, block device direct i/o doesn't need buffer block size at all.
> But in practice, it shares a lot of code with filesystem direct i/o, it
> reads the block size multiple times and it crashes if it changes.
If it's a filesystem, then the size will never change while it is mounted.
So only the direct-block-device case needs to be worried about, no?
And that uses __generic_file_aio_write() and friends, which in turn
use the readpage/writepage functions.
So for block devices, it should be sufficient to make
readpage/writepage (with the writing obviously having all the
"write_begin/write_end/fullpage" variants) be safe as far as I can
see.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists