linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Do a proper locking for mmap and block size change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121129191503.GB3490@shiny>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:15:03 -0500
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Do a proper locking for mmap and block size change

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:02:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think I'll apply this for 3.7 (since it's too late to do anything
> > fancier), and then for 3.8 I will rip out all the locking entirely,
> > because looking at the fs/buffer.c patch I wrote up, it's all totally
> > unnecessary.
> >
> > Adding a ACCESS_ONCE() to the read of the i_blkbits value (when
> > creating new buffers) simply makes the whole locking thing pointless.
> > Just make the page lock protect the block size, and make it per-page,
> > and we're done.
> 
> There's a 'block-dev' branch in my git tree, if you guys want to play
> around with it.
> 
> It actually reverts fs/block-dev.c back to the 3.6 state (except for
> some whitespace damage that I refused to re-introduce), so that part
> of the changes should be pretty safe and well tested.
> 
> The fs/buffer.c changes, of course, are new. It's largely the same
> patch I already sent out, with a small helper function to simplify it,
> and to keep the whole ACCESS_ONCE() thing in just a single place.

The fs/buffer.c part makes sense during a quick read.  But
fs/direct-io.c plays with i_blkbits too.  The semaphore was fixing real
bugs there.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/