linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] device_cgroup: keep track of local group settings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121129192945.GD26104@mail.hallyn.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:29:45 +0000
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To:	Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] device_cgroup: keep track of local group settings

Quoting Aristeu Rozanski (aris@...hat.com):
> In preparation for better hierarchy support, it's needed to retain the local
> settings in order to try to reapply them after a propagated change if they're
> still valid.
> 
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
>  
> ---
>  security/device_cgroup.c |  108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Hi,

thanks for doing this.  I've got one concern though.  I don't see
any place where devcgroup_create() was updated to create the
local exceptions list.  I think we need a guarantee that at
any time the local exceptions list will contain all the entries
contained in the cgroup->exceptions list.  Otherwise you cannot
use the exception_add() the way you do (or you can't use RCU),
since there could be a window between the successful addition
of a rule to cgroup->local.exceptions and the failed addition to
cgroup->exceptions, during which a task (since it won't need
the mutex for devcg_allow()) could exceed allowed permissions.

It's possible I'm misunderstanding.  If you think that's the case
just kick me and I'll take a fresh look.

(Btw is there a git tree or gitweb view I could look at alongside
the patchset?)

thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/