[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbq02xnVJ4tnZvOFsp8JuP6-F0KLKyyv9TgyY9dWSdDJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 18:16:34 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] clk: use struct clk only for external API
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Rabin Vincent
<rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com> wrote:
> In order to provide per-user accounting, this separates the struct clk
> used in the common clock framework into two structures 'struct clk_core'
> and 'struct clk'. struct clk_core will be used for internal
> manipulation and struct clk will be used in the clock API
> implementation.
>
> In this patch, struct clk is simply renamed to struct clk_core and a new
> struct clk is implemented which simply wraps it. In the next patch, the
> new struct clk will be used to implement per-user clock enable
> accounting.
>
> There is a rather hacky #define of clk_core to clk for the non-common
> clk case in order to avoid a mass rename of all clk non-common clk
> implementations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com>
I like the spirit of this and I think it was Thomas Gleixner who early
on strongly recommended that the struct be kept as private as possible.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists