linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] cifs: Remove unused cEVENT macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1354560401.3524.3.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:46:41 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
	linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cifs: Remove unused cEVENT macro

On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 09:39 -0600, Steve French wrote:
> But ... the need still remains for more tracing for cifs (I run into
> this a few times a month at least when debugging) - does anyone have
> any ideas for how to add dynamic trace points to cifs (has anyone even
> done it for the vfs?) - is there any file system that does a good job
> defining dynamic trace points?

I believe ext4 is the only filesystem with significant use of
tracepoints.

Ted? Any tips you care to give as to best implementation methods?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/