[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACLa4psEfdA17mcjVHhUfgmARXTZ6AVA7QJ77DymXBeVtgjZ5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:47:15 -0500
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@....net>,
Roland Eggner <edvx1@...temanalysen.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: backing up ext4 fs, system unresponsive, thrashing like crazy
even though swap is unused
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> If you are seeing a large number of inodes still in the ext4 inode
> cache after using drop_caches, then I'd look to see whether you have
> something like SELinux or auditing enabled which is pinning a bunch of
> dentries or inodes
You can safely ignore this suggestion as it does make sense. SELinux
only grabs a references to dentries during its call to
fs_ops->getxattr, which can't last a meaningful length of time (unless
the filesystem is busted). It only grabs references to inodes during
system initialization, when you couldn't have many in core.
Audit, likewise, only grabs a reference to a dentry during execve()
and only long enough to run getxattr and does not grab any reference
directly to an inode at all.
> or whether your backup program (or some other
> program running on your system) is keeping lots of directories or
> inodes open for some reason.
Certainly could be this suggestion though..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists