[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1212032125520.4173@soupermouf>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:35:00 +0200 (EET)
From: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@....net>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
cc: Roland Eggner <edvx1@...temanalysen.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: backing up ext4 fs, system unresponsive, thrashing like crazy
even though swap is unused
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
>> If you are seeing a large number of inodes still in the ext4 inode
>> cache after using drop_caches, then I'd look to see whether you have
>> something like SELinux or auditing enabled which is pinning a bunch of
>> dentries or inodes
>
> You can safely ignore this suggestion as it does make sense. SELinux
> only grabs a references to dentries during its call to
> fs_ops->getxattr, which can't last a meaningful length of time (unless
> the filesystem is busted). It only grabs references to inodes during
> system initialization, when you couldn't have many in core.
>
> Audit, likewise, only grabs a reference to a dentry during execve()
> and only long enough to run getxattr and does not grab any reference
> directly to an inode at all.
>
AFAICT I use neither SELinux nor audit.
>> or whether your backup program (or some other
>> program running on your system) is keeping lots of directories or
>> inodes open for some reason.
>
> Certainly could be this suggestion though..
>
I've managed to reproduce the scenario with concurrent "du" commands
running on the filesystems. I'll try doing it once more, but it may take a
while to get the dmesg/slabinfo etc output, since even a realtime root
shell is non-responsive for many minutes.
What other debug output do you suggest to get, to find out why ext4
inodes are pinned?
Thanks,
Dimitris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists