linux-kernel - RE: [char-misc-next 07/15] mei: use wrietl/readl instead of io wrappers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B01E9DED6@HASMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:28:23 +0000
From:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"alan@...ux.intel.com" <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [char-misc-next 07/15] mei: use wrietl/readl instead of io
 wrappers

> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static inline u32 mei_reg_read(const struct
> > mei_device *dev,  static inline void mei_reg_write(const struct mei_device
> *dev,
> >  				 unsigned long offset, u32 value)  {
> > -	iowrite32(value, dev->mem_addr + offset);
> > +	writel(value, dev->mem_addr + offset);
> 
> ioremap should match readl/writel
> iomap iowrite32/ioread32

Thanks, I can replace pci_iomap with pci_ioremap_bar although in low level it is doing just the same.


> so you need to tweak the map/unmap if you do this.
> 
> As to overhead. I'd love to see a measurement that can detect the
> difference. Do you have a benchmark that shows it ?

Don't have any numbers but it seems reasonable to me.
 I did following this example

commit 05f5b97ee0013fefbd9139cf8c3eda5f2a88c04a
Author: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 7 09:52:26 2012 -0800
 
    iwlwifi: use writeb,writel,readl directly
    
    That change will save us some CPU cycles at run time. Having port-based
    I/O seems to be not possible for PCIe devices.
    
    Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>

Thanks
Tomas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/