lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121204153716.322b2cc7@bob.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:37:16 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [char-misc-next 07/15] mei: use wrietl/readl instead of io
 wrappers

> > so you need to tweak the map/unmap if you do this.
> > 
> > As to overhead. I'd love to see a measurement that can detect the
> > difference. Do you have a benchmark that shows it ?
> 
> Don't have any numbers but it seems reasonable to me.

Processors are pretty good at prediction these days. I've not seen any
evidence to support the assumption.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ