linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] leds: leds-pwm: Convert to use devm_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:34:12 -0800
From:	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
To:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc:	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] leds: leds-pwm: Convert to use devm_get_pwm

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com> wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> On 12/03/2012 07:32 PM, Bryan Wu wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com> wrote:
>> Actually, I'm waiting for some feedback from DT maintainers about this
>> new binding. But it looks find to me.
>
> Would it be possible to have the first (or even better the first two) patch
> going for 3.8 and we can leave the DT bindings for 3.9?
> I would like to clean up, fix some of the OMAP related board files for 3.9
> which would need the patches for the leds-pwm driver itself.
>

What's best thing I can do is I can merge these patchset into my
-devel branch, after 3.8 merge window close I will move this -devel
branch to my for-next branch for 3.9 merge window.

Does this make sense to you?

Thanks,
-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/